Supplement Lab Comparison — Eurofins vs SGS vs Intertek vs ALS vs Independent Labs
Quick answer
If you're trying to pick between Eurofins, SGS, Intertek, ALS, or a smaller independent lab for supplement testing, here's the honest breakdown.
Big chains give you name recognition and massive scope — but you'll pay a premium, wait longer, and getting a real human on the phone is a grind. Independent labs are usually cheaper, faster, and way more responsive — but their scope might be narrower and your Amazon reviewer might not recognize the name.
Which is better depends entirely on what you're testing, how fast you need it, and who's going to look at the report. Let's get into it.
Eurofins
Eurofins is the 800-pound gorilla of supplement testing. They've got labs in basically every country and their scope covers nearly every method you could name.
What they're great at: Massive method scope. If you need an obscure botanical identity test or a niche pesticide panel, Eurofins probably runs it. Their reports are thorough and their brand recognition is top-tier — nobody questions a Eurofins COA.
What's annoying: Pricing. Eurofins charges a premium for that name. Expect 20-40% more than a competent independent lab for the same panel. Customer service is hit-or-miss depending on which local lab handles your account. Getting a status update on a delayed report can feel like yelling into the void. Turnaround times stretch longer than quoted, especially during busy periods.
Bottom line: Use Eurofins when you need broad scope, deep method validation, or a report that carries weight with big retailers. Don't use them if you're on a tight budget or tight timeline.
SGS
SGS is similarly massive and globally recognized. Their supplement testing division is strong, particularly in Asia-Pacific and European markets.
What they're great at: Global reach. If you're selling supplements across multiple countries with different regulatory requirements, SGS can usually handle all regions under one roof. Their stability and shelf-life programs are well-regarded. Good for large portfolios where you need consistent testing across many SKUs.
What's annoying: Bureaucracy. SGS feels more corporate than Eurofins — more forms, more account managers who change every 6 months, more internal handoffs. If you're a small brand doing 2-3 products a year, you're a rounding error to them. Turnaround times for standard panels are fine, but anything custom or unusual takes forever to quote and even longer to execute.
Bottom line: Use SGS if you need multi-country testing with one provider and you've got the volume to justify the overhead. Skip them if you're a small brand that needs a lab that actually cares about your business.
Intertek
Intertek sits between the true giants and the mid-sized labs. They're big enough to have name recognition but not quite as sprawling as Eurofins or SGS.
What they're great at: Amazon compliance packages. Intertek has leaned hard into the Amazon seller market and offers pre-built compliance panels tailored to Amazon's supplement requirements. Their reports are clean, well-formatted, and rarely get questioned by Amazon reviewers.
What's annoying: Inconsistent quality between locations. Your experience depends heavily on which Intertek facility handles your samples. Some locations are great — responsive, fast, thorough. Others are a black hole. Pricing is also inconsistent between locations for the same tests.
Bottom line: Intertek is a solid middle-ground choice, especially for Amazon-focused brands. Just vet the specific lab location before committing.
ALS
ALS (Australian Laboratory Services) is smaller than Eurofins and SGS but very well-regarded in environmental and food testing. Their supplement division is growing.
What they're great at: Trace-level contaminant testing. ALS has deep expertise in heavy metals, pesticides, and environmental contaminants at very low detection limits. Their instrumentation and technical capability match the big players.
What's annoying: Smaller supplement focus. ALS's supplement testing division isn't as developed as their environmental or food testing operations. You might get routed through a food lab that does supplement testing on the side. The reports can feel less polished than Intertek's Amazon-ready COAs.
Bottom line: Good choice for heavy metals and contaminant panels. Less ideal if you need a full supplement compliance package with identity, potency, and microbial all from one lab.
Independent Labs
This category covers everything from well-established regional labs to small specialty testing operations. Think labs like Microbac, Certified Laboratories, or a local ISO 17025 lab that's been running supplement testing for 20 years.
What they're great at: Everything the big chains aren't. Pricing is typically 30-50% lower. Turnaround is faster — often 5-7 days when big chains quote 10-14. And when you call, a real person who knows your account picks up.
You're not account #8472. You're an actual customer they want to keep.
What's annoying: Scope limitations. An independent lab might not run every method you need. You might need two labs — one for heavy metals and micro, another for a specific potency assay. Name recognition is lower — an Amazon reviewer who's never heard of "Regional Testing Labs Inc." might scrutinize the COA more.
💡 Note
The sweet spot for many brands: use a reputable independent lab for routine testing and save the big chains for the one-off specialty tests the independent can't run. Best of both worlds.
The subcontracting truth nobody talks about
Here's something the big chains don't advertise.
When you send samples to Eurofins or SGS, they don't always run every test in-house. Sometimes they subcontract — especially for niche tests like botanical DNA authentication, specific pesticide panels, or unusual microbial assays.
Your sample goes to Eurofins. Eurofins sends it to a smaller specialty lab. That lab runs the test and sends results back to Eurofins. Eurofins puts it on their letterhead and sends it to you.
You paid Eurofins pricing. The work was done by a lab that would've charged you half as much directly.
Is this shady? Not really — it's standard industry practice. But it matters because:
- You're paying a middleman markup.
- The chain of custody gets messy.
- Turnaround time includes the subcontractor's schedule.
- If there's a problem with the results, you're talking to Eurofins who's talking to the lab who ran it — telephone game.
Decision matrix
| Factor | Eurofins | SGS | Intertek | ALS | Independent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $$$$ | $$$$ | $$$ | $$$ | $$ |
| Turnaround | Slow-medium | Slow-medium | Medium | Medium | Fast |
| Scope | Huge | Huge | Large | Medium-large | Varies |
| Customer service | Depends on location | Corporate | Inconsistent | Decent | Excellent |
| Brand recognition | Maximum | Maximum | High | Medium | Low-medium |
| Amazon compliance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ (check first) |
| Best for small brands | No | No | Maybe | Maybe | Yes |
| Best for international | ✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Limited |
Request quotes for this test
Not sure which lab is right for your product? LabQuotes can help you compare quotes from both big chains and quality independent labs. You choose based on real numbers, not marketing.
Quick Reference
Lab Category Matching
Match your testing needs to the right type of lab:
- Routine COA panels (heavy metals, micro, potency) → independent lab, save money
- Niche/specialty tests → big chain with scope, or specialty independent
- Multi-country compliance → SGS or Eurofins for global consistency
- Amazon-only compliance → Intertek or quality independent with clear ISO credentials
Real Methods Explained
| Test Type | Method | Who Runs It Best |
|---|---|---|
| Heavy metals (ICP-MS) | USP <2232> | ALS, independent labs with ICP-MS |
| Microbial limits | USP <2021>/<2022> | All major labs, independent labs |
| Potency/assay (HPLC) | USP monograph | Eurofins, SGS, quality independents |
| Pesticide panels | GC-MS/MS, LC-MS/MS | Eurofins, ALS, specialty labs |
| Botanical identity | HPTLC, DNA barcoding | Eurofins, specialty botanicals labs |
| Stability/shelf-life | ICH guidelines | SGS, Eurofins |
| Nutritional labeling | AOAC methods | All major labs |
What Sample to Send
Most labs need 50-100g or 10-20 finished units. For stability studies, you need separate retained samples at multiple time points — plan for 3-5x normal quantities.
Expected Turnaround Time
Independent labs: 5-7 business days. Big chains standard: 10-14 business days. Rush service: 3-5 days (all labs). Stability studies: weeks to months depending on duration.
Accreditation Notes
All labs discussed maintain ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation. The critical check: verify the specific test method you need is within their scope. Big chains have broader scopes. Independents may have focused but narrower scopes.
Price Ranges
Basic COA panel: independent labs $250-$450, big chains $400-$700. Full compliance panel with pesticides: independent $600-$1,200, big chains $1,000-$2,500. Rush fees: 50-100% premium across the board.
Country/Region Targeting
U.S. market: A2LA/ANAB accreditation, all labs can serve. European market: prefer labs with UKAS/COFRAC/DAkkS accreditation — Eurofins and SGS have strong EU presence. Asia-Pacific: SGS and ALS have regional advantages.
Related guides
- Amazon Supplement Approved Lab List — What Labs Amazon Actually Accepts
- How to Upload a COA to Amazon Seller Central
- How Much Does Supplement Testing Cost?
- ISO 17025 Accreditation: What It Means for Supplement Testing
FAQ
Q: Is Eurofins really worth the higher price?
Depends. If you need massive method scope, multi-country compliance, or your retailer specifically requests a "name brand" lab — yes. For routine COA testing? No. A good independent lab delivers the same quality data for 30-50% less.
Q: Do big labs like Eurofins and SGS actually subcontract my tests?
Sometimes, yes. Niche or unusual tests may get sent to a specialty subcontractor. The results come back on the big lab's letterhead, but the actual work was done elsewhere. Ask your sales rep directly: "Will all testing be performed in-house?"
Q: Will Amazon accept a COA from a small independent lab?
Yes, as long as the lab is ISO/IEC 17025 accredited by an ILAC MRA signatory body, is truly third-party, and the test methods are within their scope. Amazon cares about credentials, not brand name.
Q: Which lab is fastest for supplement testing?
Independent labs typically deliver fastest — often 5-7 business days versus 10-14 from big chains. But always get a written turnaround commitment before you pay. Every lab gets backed up during peak periods.
Q: Can I use different labs for different tests on the same product?
Yes, and many brands do. You might use one lab for heavy metals and micro (cheaper and faster) and a specialty lab for a niche botanical assay. Just be aware that Amazon may ask for a single comprehensive COA — check your specific compliance requirements.
Get lab quotes
Compare quotes from big chains and independent labs. Tell us what you need tested and we'll route your request to the right labs — whether that's Eurofins or a quality independent you haven't heard of yet.
- I want quotes from both big chains and independent labs
- I need heavy metals testing
- I need microbial limits testing
- I need potency/assay testing
- I need pesticide residue testing
- I need botanical identity testing
- I need stability/shelf-life testing
- I need nutritional label testing
- Price is my top priority — show me the most affordable options
- Speed is my top priority — I need rush turnaround
- Brand recognition matters — I need a well-known lab name
- I'm selling on Amazon and need compliance-ready reports
- I sell in multiple countries and need multi-region coverage
- I'm a small brand testing 1-3 products
- I'm a mid-size or large brand with ongoing testing needs
Ready to get your products tested?
Build a basket of the tests you need and compare quotes from ISO 17025–accredited labs in one place. Free to start.
More guides
How Much Does Supplement Testing Actually Cost?
Amazon & MarketplaceAmazon Supplement Compliance: Don't Get Delisted
FDA & GMPThe "Oh Crap, The FDA Is Calling" Guide to 21 CFR 111 Testing Requirements
Getting StartedHow to Find a Supplement Testing Lab — The Complete Guide
Test MethodsHeavy Metal Testing for Supplements: Methods, Costs, and What You're Actually Testing For
Test MethodsShelf-Life and Stability Testing: How Long Does Your Supplement Actually Last?
ManufacturingContract Manufacturer Testing: Why 'They Handle It' Is the Most Dangerous Phrase in Supplements
SpecializedSports Nutrition Banned Substance Testing: NSF, Informed Sport, and BSCG Explained
Getting StartedSupplement Testing for New Brands: What to Do First (Before You Waste Money)
Getting StartedHow to Read a Certificate of Analysis: What the Numbers Actually Mean
Test MethodsProbiotic Testing: CFU Counts, Strain Verification, and Shelf-Life Stability
SpecializedCBD Testing: Potency, THC Limits, and the Tests That Keep Your Product Legal
ComplianceImporting Supplements: The Testing and Customs Documentation You Need to Clear the FDA
ManufacturingPrivate Label Supplement Testing: Why Your Manufacturer's COA Isn't Enough
ComplianceProp 65 Supplement Testing: Don't Wait for the Lawsuit Letter
ManufacturingHow to Source Ingredients That Actually Pass Prop 65 Testing
ComplianceCalifornia vs. Federal Supplement Testing: Why FDA Compliance Isn't Enough
SpecializedMushroom Supplement Testing: Is It Actually Mushrooms or Just Grain Powder?
Getting StartedYour Supplement Failed Testing. Now What?
Selling OnlineHow to Use Your Test Results in Marketing (Without Getting an FDA Letter)
Selling OnlineAmazon Supplement Reinstatement: How to Get Your Listing Back After a Compliance Removal
SpecializedGummy Vitamin Testing: The Sticky Truth Nobody Tells You
Test MethodsIs Your Magnesium Glycinate Actually Magnesium Oxide? How to Test What's Really in the Bottle
Getting StartedHow to Test Your Supplement Before Selling (First Batch Checklist)
FDA & GMPSupplement Finished Product Testing: The GMP Release Checklist
Getting StartedAre Your Supplier's COAs Real? How to Verify Raw Material Testing
Compliance5 FDA Supplement Regulations You're Probably Violating Right Now
ManufacturingHow to Switch Supplement Testing Labs Without Screwing Up Your Compliance
Getting StartedDo I Actually Need to Test My Supplements? The Honest Answer
Free Resources21 CFR 111 GMP Compliance Checklist — Free PDF Download
Free ResourcesState of Supplement Testing 2026 — Real Data From Thousands of Quotes
Free ResourcesFree Supplement Specification & COA Templates
Selling OnlineAmazon Supplement Approved Lab List — What Labs Amazon Actually Accepts
Selling OnlineHow to Upload a COA to Amazon Seller Central — Step by Step
Test MethodsAllergen & Gluten-Free Testing for Supplements — ELISA Methods
Ingredient TestingAshwagandha Testing: Withanolides, Root Auth, Heavy Metals
Ingredient TestingB-Complex Supplement Testing: Simultaneous B-Vitamin Potency HPLC Panel
Ingredient TestingBeetroot Nitrate Testing: Quantifying Active, Label Claims, Metals
Ingredient TestingBerberine Supplement Testing: HPLC Purity, Adulteration, Identity
Test MethodsBotanical Identity Testing — HPTLC, Microscopy, DNA Barcoding
SpecializedCollagen Supplement Testing — Amino Acid Profile Verification
Ingredient TestingCreatine Supplement Testing: Purity, Impurities by HPLC, and Creapure Verification
Test MethodsDisintegration & Dissolution Testing for Supplements — USP <2040>
Test MethodsDNA Barcoding Supplement Identity: Species Authentication by qPCR
FDA & GMPDSHEA Explained for Supplement Brands
Ingredient TestingElderberry Supplement Testing: Anthocyanin Content, Identity, and Microbial Safety
SpecializedElectrolyte Powder Testing — Sodium, Potassium, Magnesium Verification
Test MethodsEthylene Oxide Testing Supplements: EtO and 2-Chloroethanol by GC-MS
FDA & GMPFDA Warning Letters for Supplements -- Testing Violations
FDA & GMPForm 483 Response Guide for Supplement Companies
Ingredient TestingGinseng Testing: Ginsenoside Profile by HPLC, Species Authentication, and Pesticide Risks
Ingredient TestingGlucosamine Chondroitin Testing: Potency and Adulteration Detection
Test MethodsGlyphosate Testing Supplements: LC-MS/MS Residue Detection, Claims
Amazon & MarketplaceGMP Certificate for Amazon -- Do You Need One?
SpecializedGreens Powder Testing — Heavy Metals, Pesticides, Nutritional Panel
Getting StartedHow to Prepare Supplement Samples for Lab Testing — Shipping, Packaging, Chain of Custody
Test MethodsHPLC Potency Testing for Supplements — How It Works
Test MethodsICP-MS vs AAS for Supplement Heavy Metal Testing — Which Method?
Ingredient TestingIron Supplement Testing: ICP-MS Potency, Form Verification, Disint
Getting StartedISO 17025 for Supplement Testing, Explained
Getting StartedISO 17025 vs Non-Accredited Labs: Why It Matters for Supplement Testing
Ingredient TestingL-Theanine Supplement Testing: HPLC Purity, L vs D Enantiomer Verification, and Identity
ComplianceSupplement Label Claim Substantiation — Testing Every Word on Your Bottle
Ingredient TestingMaca Root Testing: Identity, Macamide Markers, and Heavy Metal Screening
Test MethodsMelamine Testing Supplements: Detecting Nitrogen Spiking by LC-MS/MS
SpecializedMelatonin Supplement Testing — HPLC Content Verification
Test MethodsMicrobial Limits Testing for Supplements
Test MethodsMicrocystin Testing Algae Supplements: Cyanotoxin ELISA and LC-MS/MS
Ingredient TestingMultivitamin Testing: Multi-Analyte Potency, Label Overage
Test MethodsMycotoxin Testing Supplements: Aflatoxins, Ochratoxin A, Fumonisins
Test MethodsNitrosamine Testing Supplements: NDMA/NDEA Detection by LC-MS/MS
Ingredient TestingNMN Supplement Testing: Purity by HPLC, NMN vs NR Verification, and Regulatory Status
Test MethodsNon-GMO PCR Testing for Supplements — How It Works
SpecializedNSF Certified for Sport vs Informed Sport — Which Testing Program?
SpecializedOmega-3 & Fish Oil Supplement Testing — EPA, DHA, TOTOX
ComplianceOrganic Supplement Certification — Testing Requirements
Getting Started7 Supplement Tests You're Probably Overpaying For (And How to Fix It)
Test MethodsPAH Testing Supplements: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC-MS
Test MethodsPesticide Testing for Supplements — Multi-Residue Screen Guide
Ingredient TestingPre-Workout Supplement Testing: Banned Stimulants and Label Accuracy
Ingredient TestingPrenatal Vitamin Testing: Folate Form, Heavy Metal Safety, Potency
Ingredient TestingProtein Powder Testing: Heavy Metals, Amino Spiking, and Real Protein Content
Ingredient TestingPsyllium Fiber Testing: Identity, Microbial Screening for Salmonella, and Water Activity
Test MethodsResidual Solvent Testing for Supplements — USP <467>
Ingredient TestingSaw Palmetto Testing: Fatty Acid Profile, Adulteration, Identity
Ingredient TestingSea Moss Testing: Iodine Content, Heavy Metals, Species Auth
ComplianceSkip Lot Testing for Supplements — When You Can Reduce Testing
Ingredient TestingSpirulina Chlorella Testing: Microcystin, Heavy Metals, Micro
ComplianceStructure/Function Claims Testing Requirements
ComplianceSupplement Facts Panel Testing Requirements
Getting StartedThird-Party Supplement Testing: Why It's Non-Negotiable
Ingredient TestingTurmeric Curcumin Testing: Potency, Lead Chromate, Identity
Test MethodsUSP 2232 Heavy Metals Testing Explained
Ingredient TestingVitamin C Testing: Ascorbic Acid HPLC Potency, Degradation, Stability
SpecializedVitamin D Potency Testing — HPLC vs LC-MS/MS Methods
Test MethodsWater Activity Testing for Supplements — Why It Matters