Plus de 65 000 laboratoires dans le monde, et ça continue
Test Methods

Ethylene Oxide Testing Supplements: EtO and 2-Chloroethanol by GC-MS

8 min read Updated June 12, 2026

Ethylene oxide (EtO) testing for dietary supplements has become increasingly important since 2020-2021 when the European Union's Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) issued hundreds of notifications for ethylene oxide contamination in food and supplement ingredients, particularly those sourced from India. Ethylene oxide is a fumigant used to reduce microbial contamination in spices, herbs, and botanicals, but its use is banned in food in the EU because it is classified as a carcinogen, mutagen, and reproductive toxicant. Lab testing for ethylene oxide detects both EtO itself and its primary reaction product 2-chloroethanol (2-CE), which forms when EtO reacts with chloride ions in the treated material.

This article covers the GC-MS/MS method used for EtO and 2-CE detection, the regulatory landscape, ingredients most commonly affected, and practical guidance for supplement brands navigating ethylene oxide testing requirements for EU and international markets.

GC-MS/MS Detection of Ethylene Oxide and 2-Chloroethanol

Ethylene oxide (C2H4O) is a volatile, reactive epoxide with a boiling point of 10.7 degrees Celsius. Because of its volatility and reactivity, EtO itself may not persist in treated materials as long as its more stable reaction product 2-chloroethanol (2-CE, also called ethylene chlorohydrin). Modern testing methods target both EtO and 2-CE, and the results are typically summed and expressed as total ethylene oxide equivalents, considering the molecular weight difference between EtO (44.05) and 2-CE (80.51).

Gas chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) is the preferred method for EtO and 2-CE analysis. The sample is extracted with an organic solvent (commonly acetonitrile or ethyl acetate), and the extract is analyzed by GC-MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Detection limits are typically 0.01-0.02 mg/kg (ppm) for both EtO and 2-CE, which is well below current regulatory limits of 0.1 mg/kg.

Some labs use headspace GC-MS for EtO specifically, taking advantage of its volatility. However, headspace methods may underreport 2-CE, which is less volatile. A solvent extraction method followed by GC-MS/MS analysis of the extract is generally preferred for comprehensive detection of both compounds. Confirm with your lab that their method detects both EtO and 2-CE and that results are reported as the sum expressed as ethylene oxide.

⚠️ Note

Ethylene oxide can be present both as a deliberate fumigant residue and as a byproduct of ingredient processing. Some ingredients, particularly those treated with ethylene oxide for microbial reduction, may test positive even if the ingredient supplier claims no direct EtO fumigation. The formation of 2-CE from EtO residues reacting with naturally occurring chlorides in plant material complicates the interpretation of test results.

Regulatory Limits

The European Union has set a maximum residue limit (MRL) of 0.1 mg/kg (sum of EtO and 2-CE expressed as EtO) for ethylene oxide in food and food supplements. This is effectively a zero-tolerance limit given the detection capabilities of modern analytical methods. Products exceeding this limit are subject to withdrawal, recall, and RASFF notification.

The United States has not established a specific MRL for EtO in dietary supplements. The EPA regulates EtO as a pesticide and has established tolerances for EtO residues on specific food commodities (ranging from 7-50 ppm for various spices and herbs), but these tolerances do not directly apply to dietary supplements. However, US brands exporting to the EU must meet EU limits, and many US retailers and brands voluntarily adopt EU-aligned limits as a best practice.

Other major markets including Canada, Japan, Korea, and Australia/New Zealand have varying EtO regulations. Brands selling internationally should verify the specific limits in each target market and test accordingly.

At-Risk Ingredients and Supply Chain Factors

The RASFF notifications since 2020 have identified a pattern of EtO contamination in specific ingredient categories and supply chains:

Spices and spice extracts, particularly from India, have been the most frequently notified category. Turmeric, ginger, black pepper, cumin, chili, and coriander have all been subject to EtO-related recalls. Seeds used in supplements, including psyllium husk, flaxseed, sesame seed, and chia seed, have also been affected. Other botanicals including ashwagandha, moringa, garcinia cambogia, and various herbal extracts have appeared in RASFF notifications.

The contamination is often traced to EtO fumigation at the raw material or processing stage, applied to reduce microbial counts (particularly Salmonella) before export. Some ingredient suppliers in regions where EtO fumigation is common may use it without disclosure to buyers, creating supply chain risk that can only be managed through testing.

Organic-certified ingredients are not immune to EtO contamination, as cross-contamination can occur in shared storage or transport facilities. The detection of EtO in organic ingredients has been particularly damaging because organic certification prohibits EtO use.

Testing Strategy and Frequency

For brands selling into the EU, every lot of high-risk ingredients (spices, seed products, herbs from India and Southeast Asia) should be tested for EtO/2-CE before EU export. For brands selling only in the US, testing frequency can be risk-based but should include initial supplier qualification testing and periodic surveillance.

A practical testing program for EtO should mirror the approach used for pesticide testing, since EtO is functionally a pesticide residue. Include EtO/2-CE in your pesticide screening panel or run it as a separate test on high-risk ingredients. Document your risk assessment and testing frequency in your quality plan.

Quick Reference

Lab Category Matching

Testing NeedLab Requirement
EtO and 2-CE detectionGC-MS/MS, solvent extraction
EtO only (volatile)Headspace GC-MS
Multi-pesticide panel including EtOGC-MS/MS + LC-MS/MS
EU MRL compliance testing0.1 mg/kg reporting limit
Rapid screeningNot widely available; confirmatory method preferred

Real Methods Explained

MethodWhat It TestsDetection LimitCost per Sample
GC-MS/MS (solvent extraction)EtO + 2-CE sum0.01-0.02 mg/kg$150-$300
Headspace GC-MSEtO (volatile fraction)0.01-0.05 mg/kg$150-$250
QuEChERS + GC-MS/MSEtO + 2-CE (multi-residue)0.01-0.05 mg/kg$200-$400

What Sample to Send

Send 25-50 grams of powdered material in a sealed container. For finished products, send 15-20 capsules or tablets. EtO is volatile, so ensure samples are sealed in airtight packaging and shipped promptly. If the sample is a whole spice or seed that requires grinding before analysis, confirm with the lab whether they will grind or whether you should send pre-ground material. Grinding can release volatile EtO, so the lab should use cold grinding or direct solvent extraction of intact material when possible.

Expected Turnaround Time

TestingTypical TAT
EtO/2-CE single test5-7 business days
As part of pesticide panel7-10 business days
Rapid/priority service3-5 business days

Price Ranges

TestingTypical Price Range
EtO/2-CE only (GC-MS/MS)$150-$300
EtO only (headspace)$150-$250
Included in multi-pesticide panelIncremental: $50-$150
Batch testing (10+ samples)Discounted: $100-$200 per sample

Country/Region Targeting

EU: 0.1 mg/kg maximum (sum EtO + 2-CE expressed as EtO), effectively zero tolerance. RASFF enforcement is active. US: No specific MRL for supplements; EPA tolerances for EtO on food commodities apply to raw agricultural commodities, not finished supplements. Canada: Aligns with EU approach; 0.1 mg/kg for most foods. Japan: Specified MRLs by commodity. Korea: MRLs by commodity under Food Code. Australia/NZ: Monitoring but no specific MRL for all supplement ingredients. Brands should test to the most stringent limit applicable to their markets.

FAQ

Q: What is the difference between ethylene oxide and 2-chloroethanol?

Ethylene oxide (EtO) is the fumigant itself. 2-chloroethanol (2-CE) is formed when EtO reacts with chloride ions naturally present in the treated material. Because EtO is volatile and reactive, it may dissipate from treated material, leaving 2-CE as the primary detectable residue. EU regulations require summing EtO and 2-CE (with 2-CE converted to EtO equivalents by multiplying by 0.55, the ratio of molecular weights) and comparing the sum to the 0.1 mg/kg limit.

Q: Can I test for ethylene oxide as part of a standard pesticide screen?

Some multi-residue pesticide screens include EtO and 2-CE, but many do not because EtO requires specific GC-MS conditions and has properties (high volatility, low molecular weight) that differ from most pesticide analytes. Confirm with your lab whether their pesticide panel covers EtO/2-CE or whether a separate test is required. A combined approach where EtO/2-CE is appended to your pesticide testing order is usually possible.

Q: My ingredient is certified organic. Do I still need EtO testing?

Yes. Organic certification prohibits EtO use, but cross-contamination from adjacent fumigated lots during storage or transport has been documented. The detection of EtO at low levels in organic ingredients does not necessarily mean the organic ingredient was directly fumigated; it may result from environmental cross-contamination. However, any detectable EtO in organic ingredients is a compliance issue for EU organic standards. Testing organic ingredients for EtO, particularly those sourced from regions where EtO fumigation is practiced, is a prudent risk management measure.

Q: How should I interpret results where only 2-CE is detected but not EtO?

This is a common finding. Because EtO is volatile, it may have dissipated from the sample while 2-CE, being less volatile, persists. The sum of EtO + 2-CE (as EtO equivalents) should be compared to the regulatory limit. A result showing detectable 2-CE with no detectable EtO still counts toward the total and may exceed the 0.1 mg/kg limit depending on the 2-CE concentration. The absence of detectable EtO does not mean the sample was never fumigated.

Q: Are there non-fumigant sources of ethylene oxide in supplements?

Yes. Ethylene oxide is used industrially to produce ethoxylated ingredients including polysorbates (polysorbate 80, polysorbate 20), PEGs (polyethylene glycols), and some emulsifiers. While these ingredients are not meant to contain residual EtO, trace contamination from manufacturing is theoretically possible. Most EtO detections in supplements are from fumigation, not from ethoxylated excipients, but this should be considered during contamination investigation. Additionally, some plant materials can produce trace EtO endogenously, though at levels below typical detection limits for the fumigant residue testing methods.

Get lab testing quotes ->

Ready to get your products tested?

Build a basket of the tests you need and compare quotes from ISO 17025–accredited labs in one place. Free to start.

Get lab quotes

More guides

Cost & Pricing

How Much Does Supplement Testing Actually Cost?

Amazon & Marketplace

Amazon Supplement Compliance: Don't Get Delisted

FDA & GMP

The "Oh Crap, The FDA Is Calling" Guide to 21 CFR 111 Testing Requirements

Getting Started

How to Find a Supplement Testing Lab — The Complete Guide

Test Methods

Heavy Metal Testing for Supplements: Methods, Costs, and What You're Actually Testing For

Test Methods

Shelf-Life and Stability Testing: How Long Does Your Supplement Actually Last?

Manufacturing

Contract Manufacturer Testing: Why 'They Handle It' Is the Most Dangerous Phrase in Supplements

Specialized

Sports Nutrition Banned Substance Testing: NSF, Informed Sport, and BSCG Explained

Getting Started

Supplement Testing for New Brands: What to Do First (Before You Waste Money)

Getting Started

How to Read a Certificate of Analysis: What the Numbers Actually Mean

Test Methods

Probiotic Testing: CFU Counts, Strain Verification, and Shelf-Life Stability

Specialized

CBD Testing: Potency, THC Limits, and the Tests That Keep Your Product Legal

Compliance

Importing Supplements: The Testing and Customs Documentation You Need to Clear the FDA

Manufacturing

Private Label Supplement Testing: Why Your Manufacturer's COA Isn't Enough

Compliance

Prop 65 Supplement Testing: Don't Wait for the Lawsuit Letter

Manufacturing

How to Source Ingredients That Actually Pass Prop 65 Testing

Compliance

California vs. Federal Supplement Testing: Why FDA Compliance Isn't Enough

Specialized

Mushroom Supplement Testing: Is It Actually Mushrooms or Just Grain Powder?

Getting Started

Your Supplement Failed Testing. Now What?

Selling Online

How to Use Your Test Results in Marketing (Without Getting an FDA Letter)

Selling Online

Amazon Supplement Reinstatement: How to Get Your Listing Back After a Compliance Removal

Specialized

Gummy Vitamin Testing: The Sticky Truth Nobody Tells You

Test Methods

Is Your Magnesium Glycinate Actually Magnesium Oxide? How to Test What's Really in the Bottle

Getting Started

How to Test Your Supplement Before Selling (First Batch Checklist)

FDA & GMP

Supplement Finished Product Testing: The GMP Release Checklist

Getting Started

Are Your Supplier's COAs Real? How to Verify Raw Material Testing

Compliance

5 FDA Supplement Regulations You're Probably Violating Right Now

Manufacturing

How to Switch Supplement Testing Labs Without Screwing Up Your Compliance

Getting Started

Do I Actually Need to Test My Supplements? The Honest Answer

Free Resources

21 CFR 111 GMP Compliance Checklist — Free PDF Download

Free Resources

State of Supplement Testing 2026 — Real Data From Thousands of Quotes

Free Resources

Free Supplement Specification & COA Templates

Selling Online

Amazon Supplement Approved Lab List — What Labs Amazon Actually Accepts

Selling Online

How to Upload a COA to Amazon Seller Central — Step by Step

Getting Started

Supplement Lab Comparison — Eurofins vs SGS vs Intertek vs ALS vs Independent Labs

Test Methods

Allergen & Gluten-Free Testing for Supplements — ELISA Methods

Ingredient Testing

Ashwagandha Testing: Withanolides, Root Auth, Heavy Metals

Ingredient Testing

B-Complex Supplement Testing: Simultaneous B-Vitamin Potency HPLC Panel

Ingredient Testing

Beetroot Nitrate Testing: Quantifying Active, Label Claims, Metals

Ingredient Testing

Berberine Supplement Testing: HPLC Purity, Adulteration, Identity

Test Methods

Botanical Identity Testing — HPTLC, Microscopy, DNA Barcoding

Specialized

Collagen Supplement Testing — Amino Acid Profile Verification

Ingredient Testing

Creatine Supplement Testing: Purity, Impurities by HPLC, and Creapure Verification

Test Methods

Disintegration & Dissolution Testing for Supplements — USP <2040>

Test Methods

DNA Barcoding Supplement Identity: Species Authentication by qPCR

FDA & GMP

DSHEA Explained for Supplement Brands

Ingredient Testing

Elderberry Supplement Testing: Anthocyanin Content, Identity, and Microbial Safety

Specialized

Electrolyte Powder Testing — Sodium, Potassium, Magnesium Verification

FDA & GMP

FDA Warning Letters for Supplements -- Testing Violations

FDA & GMP

Form 483 Response Guide for Supplement Companies

Ingredient Testing

Ginseng Testing: Ginsenoside Profile by HPLC, Species Authentication, and Pesticide Risks

Ingredient Testing

Glucosamine Chondroitin Testing: Potency and Adulteration Detection

Test Methods

Glyphosate Testing Supplements: LC-MS/MS Residue Detection, Claims

Amazon & Marketplace

GMP Certificate for Amazon -- Do You Need One?

Specialized

Greens Powder Testing — Heavy Metals, Pesticides, Nutritional Panel

Getting Started

How to Prepare Supplement Samples for Lab Testing — Shipping, Packaging, Chain of Custody

Test Methods

HPLC Potency Testing for Supplements — How It Works

Test Methods

ICP-MS vs AAS for Supplement Heavy Metal Testing — Which Method?

Ingredient Testing

Iron Supplement Testing: ICP-MS Potency, Form Verification, Disint

Getting Started

ISO 17025 for Supplement Testing, Explained

Getting Started

ISO 17025 vs Non-Accredited Labs: Why It Matters for Supplement Testing

Ingredient Testing

L-Theanine Supplement Testing: HPLC Purity, L vs D Enantiomer Verification, and Identity

Compliance

Supplement Label Claim Substantiation — Testing Every Word on Your Bottle

Ingredient Testing

Maca Root Testing: Identity, Macamide Markers, and Heavy Metal Screening

Test Methods

Melamine Testing Supplements: Detecting Nitrogen Spiking by LC-MS/MS

Specialized

Melatonin Supplement Testing — HPLC Content Verification

Test Methods

Microbial Limits Testing for Supplements

Test Methods

Microcystin Testing Algae Supplements: Cyanotoxin ELISA and LC-MS/MS

Ingredient Testing

Multivitamin Testing: Multi-Analyte Potency, Label Overage

Test Methods

Mycotoxin Testing Supplements: Aflatoxins, Ochratoxin A, Fumonisins

Test Methods

Nitrosamine Testing Supplements: NDMA/NDEA Detection by LC-MS/MS

Ingredient Testing

NMN Supplement Testing: Purity by HPLC, NMN vs NR Verification, and Regulatory Status

Test Methods

Non-GMO PCR Testing for Supplements — How It Works

Specialized

NSF Certified for Sport vs Informed Sport — Which Testing Program?

Specialized

Omega-3 & Fish Oil Supplement Testing — EPA, DHA, TOTOX

Compliance

Organic Supplement Certification — Testing Requirements

Getting Started

7 Supplement Tests You're Probably Overpaying For (And How to Fix It)

Test Methods

PAH Testing Supplements: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by GC-MS

Test Methods

Pesticide Testing for Supplements — Multi-Residue Screen Guide

Ingredient Testing

Pre-Workout Supplement Testing: Banned Stimulants and Label Accuracy

Ingredient Testing

Prenatal Vitamin Testing: Folate Form, Heavy Metal Safety, Potency

Ingredient Testing

Protein Powder Testing: Heavy Metals, Amino Spiking, and Real Protein Content

Ingredient Testing

Psyllium Fiber Testing: Identity, Microbial Screening for Salmonella, and Water Activity

Test Methods

Residual Solvent Testing for Supplements — USP <467>

Ingredient Testing

Saw Palmetto Testing: Fatty Acid Profile, Adulteration, Identity

Ingredient Testing

Sea Moss Testing: Iodine Content, Heavy Metals, Species Auth

Compliance

Skip Lot Testing for Supplements — When You Can Reduce Testing

Ingredient Testing

Spirulina Chlorella Testing: Microcystin, Heavy Metals, Micro

Compliance

Structure/Function Claims Testing Requirements

Compliance

Supplement Facts Panel Testing Requirements

Getting Started

Third-Party Supplement Testing: Why It's Non-Negotiable

Ingredient Testing

Turmeric Curcumin Testing: Potency, Lead Chromate, Identity

Test Methods

USP 2232 Heavy Metals Testing Explained

Ingredient Testing

Vitamin C Testing: Ascorbic Acid HPLC Potency, Degradation, Stability

Specialized

Vitamin D Potency Testing — HPLC vs LC-MS/MS Methods

Test Methods

Water Activity Testing for Supplements — Why It Matters